Religion and the Shape of Liberalism

Over the last several weeks, I've been putting together an annotated bibliography on religion and liberalism for the Religion and Its Publics project at UVA. The bibliography attempts to get clear on exactly what liberalism means while also exploring what critics find objectionable about it. Ultimately, I offer a "bibliography with an agenda," as I put it in the introduction, because I defend a "chastened" or "thin" liberalism as the best political arrangement we can hope for under conditions of pluralism. I am disinclined to view liberalism as good in itself because those living in liberal societies may be forced to make grave moral compromises, but it is nevertheless the best system we can hope for since it prevents even worse moral calamities, like violations of conscience that call the worthwhileness of life into question (e.g., forced conversion). Here is the bibliography's table of contents:

(1) Liberalism Defined
  (1a) The History of Liberalism
  (1b) Historical Texts of the Liberal Canon
  (1c) Liberalism in the 20th Century

(2) Liberalism Critiqued
  (2a) Critiques from the Left
  (2b) The Libertarian Critique
  (2c) Critiques from the Right
  (2d) The Religious Critique

(3) Liberalism Defended

(4) Liberalism Chastened

A PDF of the entire bibliography can be found here. It is part of a larger set of resources managed by the Religion and Its Publics project, including additional bibliographies by my colleagues.